Bakery sued for not baking gays a cake

It did so on grounds that are specific to this particular case and will have little to no applicability to future cases. By Ryan Warner and Tom Hesse. Colorado Postcards are snapshots of our colorful state in sound. Relying on the findings of a Denver judge in a trial in the dispute, the appeals court said Phillips' shop initially agreed to make the cake but then refused after Scardina explained that she was going to use it to celebrate her transition from male to female.

We can help you keep up. Government and Politics. You care. Sign up here and we will see you in the morning! (Reuters) - A Colorado baker who had won a narrow U.S. Supreme Court victory over his refusal to make a wedding cake for a gay couple on Thursday lost his appeal of a ruling in a separate case.

Lorie Smith, who is also represented by ADF, claims the law violates her freedom of speech. She pursued the lawsuit against Phillips and Masterpiece on her own. Before filing her lawsuit, Scardina first filed a complaint against Phillips with the state and the civil rights commission, which found probable cause that he had discriminated against her.

Indie Listen to a Colorado Postcard Colorado Postcards are snapshots of our colorful state in sound. By Indie Staff. The Colorado baker who won a partial U. The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that that the cake Autumn Scardina requested from Jack Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop, which was to be pink with blue frosting, is not a form of speech.

Latest Stories. The Supreme Court on Monday threw out a ruling against two Oregon bakers who refused to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple. In March , lawyers for the state and Phillips agreed to drop both cases under a settlement Scardina was not involved in.

Listen now. Colorado Wonders. Last year it heard another case challenging Colorado's anti-discrimination law, brought by a Christian graphic artist who does not want to design wedding websites for same-sex couples. By John Daley. It also found that the state law that makes it illegal to refuse to provide services to people based on protected characteristics like race, religion or sexual orientation does not violate business owners' right to practice or express their religion.

Phillips, who is represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, maintains that the cakes he creates are a form of speech and plans to appeal. In the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, the Supreme Court on Monday ruled for a bakery that had refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple.

The Lookout is a free, daily email newsletter with news and happenings from all over Colorado. John McHugh, one of the lawyers who represent Scardina, said the court looked carefully at all the arguments and evidence from the trial. By Briana Heaney. Read our previous coverage on Masterpiece Cakeshop.

They give brief insights into our people and places, our flora and fauna, and our past and present, from every corner of Colorado. Our newsletters bring you a closer look at the stories that affect you and the music that inspires you. In , the U. Supreme Court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission had acted with anti-religious bias in enforcing the anti-discrimination law against Phillips after he refused to bake a cake celebrating the wedding of Charlie Craig and Dave Mullins in The high court did not rule then on the larger issue of whether a business can invoke religious objections to refuse service to LGBTQ people, but it has another chance to do so.

You want to know what is really going on these days, especially in Colorado. The case dealt with Masterpiece Cakeshop, a bakery in Lakewood, Colorado, which refused to design a custom wedding cake for a gay couple based on the owner's religious beliefs.